Tool · risk maths
Aviatrix strategy: what tactics change and what they don't
A tactic sets your stake, cash-out target and stop rule. It doesn't remove the 3% house edge — the calculator shows why.
Auto cash-out calculator
RTP 97%—chance to reach target
—expected session result
—sessions in profit
—sessions losing the bankroll
Model: chance to reach the target = 0.97 / target. 5,000 sessions simulated in your browser.
Tactics compared
| Tactic | Idea | Share of winning sessions | Risk of a big loss | Expected value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low target ×1.3–1.5 | Frequent small cash-outs | High | Medium | −3% |
| Two-bet split | One early, one for a high multiplier | Medium | Medium | −3% |
| Martingale | Double after each loss | High | Very high | −3% |
| Chasing ×10+ | Rare big cash-outs | Low | High | −3% |
Works as discipline
- A session budget you can afford to lose entirely
- Flat stakes, no chasing
- Auto cash-out set before take-off
- Time and loss limits
- Demo first, money later
Myths
- “A high one is due after a run of lows”
- “Signals know the next round”
- “A levelled plane flies further”
Read next
Strategy FAQ
Is there a winning Aviatrix strategy?
No. A tactic changes the spread of results, but every bet's expected value is minus 3%.
Which auto cash-out target should I pick?
One where a likely losing streak fits inside your session budget.
Does Martingale work?
It often gives a small profit and occasionally loses the whole bankroll. Overall it's still minus 3%.